Kathmandu: Two lawmakers from the ruling Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) have publicly expressed concerns regarding the government's functioning and the budget for the upcoming fiscal year, highlighting differing perspectives from within the ruling camp.

Speaking during the Zero Hour of the House of Representatives on Thursday, RSP MP Bipin Kumar Acharya questioned the effectiveness of parliamentary discussions, particularly the lack of implementation of issues raised by lawmakers on behalf of the public. He argued that concerns voiced during Zero Hour often disappear without any meaningful action from the government.

Acharya remarked that if the issues raised by MPs are not addressed, the session should be called a "black hole time" rather than "Zero Hour." He said that citizens' concerns, lawmakers' questions, and national issues should not vanish into a system that neither responds nor takes responsibility.

According to Acharya, Zero Hour is intended to serve as a constitutional mechanism through which people's grievances and concerns are brought before Parliament. He called for a system in which issues raised by lawmakers are formally forwarded to the relevant ministries and implementation progress reports are provided within a fixed timeframe.

He emphasized that parliamentary accountability would be strengthened only when concerns raised in the House lead to tangible action rather than remaining confined to official records.

Meanwhile, fellow RSP lawmaker Dr. Amresh Kumar Singh expressed dissatisfaction with the government's budget while participating in discussions on the annual estimates of revenue and expenditure.

Singh described the budget as a "deflated balloon," arguing that it lacked the strength and credibility needed for effective implementation. He questioned whether the government's revenue projections and financing plans were realistic and sustainable.

The MP strongly criticized provisions related to taxation in the education and health sectors. Referring to Nepal's Constitution, he argued that education and healthcare are fundamental rights and should not be burdened with additional taxes that ultimately affect students and ordinary citizens.

Singh also noted the absence of significant measures aimed at strengthening public education. He said he had expected ambitious initiatives to improve educational standards nationwide, including establishing high-quality schools across all provinces.

The lawmaker further raised concerns about Nepal's growing public debt. He argued that an increasing share of government borrowing is being used to service existing debt obligations rather than finance development projects. According to him, this trend could place additional pressure on future development spending.

Singh also highlighted the gap between prices received by farmers and prices paid by consumers. He argued that the budget had failed to adequately address structural problems in agricultural markets, where producers receive low returns while consumers face high costs.

The remarks from both MPs reflect concerns about governance effectiveness, accountability, budget implementation, public services, and economic management, even from within the ruling party itself.