Kathmandu: Former President Dr. Ram Baran Yadav has criticized what he described as anti-federalist views within the current government, saying that some leaders in power do not understand the essence of democracy and the spirit of Nepal's Constitution.

Speaking at the launch of the book "Chakra Prasad Bastola's Intellectualism and Rebellion" in Kathmandu on Wednesday, Dr. Yadav expressed strong objection to recent remarks by the Finance Minister suggesting that Nepal should reconsider or abolish federalism.

Warning Against Weakening Federalism
Dr. Yadav said that questioning federalism could push the country backward and undermine the democratic gains achieved through decades of political struggle.

He argued that federalism is deeply linked to Nepal's political and constitutional framework and should not be treated lightly.

"There are people in the current governing system who do not understand the essence of democracy. When the Finance Minister speaks about ending federalism, it opens Pandora's box and risks taking the country backward. Federalism is connected with many aspects of our nation, and such remarks are a serious concern," he said.

Criticism of Government Leaders
The former President said it was particularly disappointing to hear anti-federalist opinions from individuals regarded as educated professionals who have worked with international organizations and were expected to contribute to Nepal's economic and social transformation.

He alleged that attempts to weaken federalism reflect a misunderstanding of democratic principles and the values enshrined in the Constitution.

Protect Democratic Achievements
Dr. Yadav emphasized that Nepal has no alternative but to safeguard the democratic system and constitutional achievements secured through long political struggles.

He urged political leaders to strengthen rather than weaken federalism, arguing that the country's future depends on protecting inclusive democracy and the constitutional framework established after years of public movements and political consensus.